Regarding “Diversionary Strike on a Rights Group” by Kathleen Peratis
[op-ed, Aug. 30]:
Ms. Peratis’s defense of Human Rights Watch is based on a grossly
distorted presentation of NGO Monitor’s systematic research. Our
analyses covering the past five years demonstrate that HRW officials
have disproportionately targeted Israel, omitting the context of
terrorism, while neglecting real human rights violations in Syria,
Libya and Saudi Arabia.
Human Rights Watch officials focus far more on alleged Israeli and
American “war crimes” than on the genocide in Sudan or the violence
in Sri Lanka. HRW’s agenda is obsessively partisan, and NGO Monitor
has detailed examples of false or unverifiable claims by HRW.
Condemnations of “indiscriminate attacks” in Lebanon were based on
“eyewitness testimony” denying the presence of Hezbollah members and
weapons in Qana, Srifa and elsewhere. But journalists found clear
evidence of this presence. Such distorted Human Rights Watch reports
feed hatred in Pakistan, Turkey, Malaysia and the rest of the Muslim world.
For all of these reasons, the need for NGO Monitor to watch the
watchers is clear.
GERALD M. STEINBERG
Editor
NGO Monitor
Jerusalem
Prof. Steinberg heads the Conflict Resolution Program at Bar-Ilan University and is a member of the SPME Board of Directors
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/19/AR2006091901551_pf.html