SPME responds to the Statement of Solidarity in Opposition to the Repressive Climate on US Campuses

SPME Responds to the Solidarity Statement claiming a "Repressive Climate on US Campuses"

Almost 900 academics, claiming they are “transformational educators,” with a commitment to “education, learning and safety,” signed a letter in “Opposition to the Repressive Climate on US Campuses.” Is that repressive climate the one that attacks Jews and forbids any public defense of Israel? The one that disrupts classes and library reading rooms with slogans of “No Normalcy During the Genocide!” “Glory to Our Martyrs,” and chants of “Globalize the Intifada,” and “From the River to the Sea Palestine will be Free”? The ones who chase Jews on campus into hiding places while they rant in public, who call for raping and killing Jewish students? Is that the professors who express their admiration and exhilaration at Hamas’ awesome blow against the oppressor’s “monopoly of violence” and encourage aggressive protests in support of these mass murderers on college campuses?

No. Quite the contrary, these professors want to prevent any effort to rein back these aggressive demonstrations that have applauded Hamas’ savage and sadistic massacres of 7/10. They denounce administrators who argue that embedded in calls for intifada is a genocidal message that makes Jews feel unsafe. This is “baseless and dangerous,” they claim against all evidence. On the contrary, they insist, intifada in Arabic just “means uprising.” Defiantly, they declare: “We will not cede our expertise [sic] to administrators who broadly and selectively interpret terms, ideas, and concepts as they please, in the service of their political and economic gains and military investments.”

The problem, of course, is that they are the ones “broadly and selectively interpreting terms as they please.” Intifada does not mean uprising in Arabic, that’s the loose English translation. In Arabic, it means “shrugging off,” as a great beast shrugs off an annoying insect, like the Arab-Muslim world shakes off the most recent colonial implant. And in in 2000, it designated the first jihadi suicide-terror war against the civilians of another country, an effort to “shake off” the alien Zionist presence with mass murder of women children and the elderly.

If we can ban terms like “Master” of a Harvard House because it stirs primal memories of slavery 160 years ago among Black students, why would a murderous and merciless “intifada” that targeted children only 20 years ago, revived so horrifically on October 7, and taken up enthusiastically by supporters on their campuses, not make Jewish students feel “threatened and endangered by such words”? How cruel, how macro-aggressive can one get to dismiss these fears as “baseless and dangerous”?

And what is the “danger” these academics fear? They explain: “Intentionally criminalizing the Arabic language, implies that the language itself, and therefore Arabic speakers generally, are inherently violent and genocidal.” And yet, no one has made such absurd claims; they are invented.

This technique has been a mainstay of cancel culture that has targeted the critics of the Palestinian Narrative relentlessly: put ridiculously offensive words in your target’s mouth, create a moral panic, and drive them from the public sphere. In so doing, these academics seek to forbid anyone from making the far more accurate and worrisome observation that the Arabic language is currently one of the major vehicles for genocidal Jew (and infidel)-hating in the world, especially among Palestinians, just as, in the 1930s, the German language was.

Indeed if one listens to what circulates in the Arab public sphere about Israel, it is shot through with hatred of not just Jews but the West. From the pulpits Muslims hear the ubiquitous genocidal “hadith of the rocks and trees.” From pulpit to political speech to commoner in the street, Palestinians believe that Allah brought the Jews back to the land between the river and the sea so that they could the more easily be slaughtered. By any progressive standards, this is a toxic cultural environment. And yet, if one searched the publications and curricula of these “experts,” one would find very little discussion of such “dangerous” issues.

What we confront with this letter is a mirror image of what it projects onto administrators and donors trying to bridle these shocking expressions of support for a genocidal ideology. The signers who dismiss as politically motivated any contradiction to the claims of their new pedagogy, are, in reality, ideologically (and financially) driven ones, whose program of education is entirely in the service of various radical causes, including the Palestinian one, which they somehow consider the height of progressive politics. These are the people who manipulate and corrupt the language for a totalitarian political agenda that leaves toxic consequences in the wake of its success.

The letter introduces its signers:

As educators invested in developing and upholding constructive learning environments, critical engagements with knowledge building, and transformative pedagogical discussions, we refuse to adhere to the censorship, policing, and the circumventing of our academic work and mission as educators.

In light of both the ideologies they promote with their transformational education and the causes they support, one might read this passage as follows:a

As propagandists invested in developing and upholding environments of rigorous indoctrination according to which America and Israel are evil racist empires and Palestinian Jihad, noble resistance, committed to doctrine-building and transformative brainwashing sessions in which we censor everything contradictory to our “teachings,” we refuse to allow anyone to stand in the way of our missionary work in the service of our cause..

In genocide studies, the term is “Mirror Politics”: projecting your own publicly unavowable goals and methods onto your enemy.

Or as the Ukrainian-Soviet writer, Vasily Grossman, put it in 1960: “Tell me what you accuse the Jews of, I’ll tell you what you are guilty of.”

This statement is authored and circulated by Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME). We invite all educators at US academic institutions and beyond to sign


204 signatures

Share this with your friends:


Latest Signatures
204Inna BumaginJan 31, 2024
203Batsheva FrankelJan 29, 2024
202Tabia LeeJan 27, 2024
201David A. HorowitzJan 25, 2024
200RIchard LandesJan 23, 2024
199Meryl NadellJan 23, 2024
198Asaf RomirowskyJan 23, 2024
197Jack RichmanJan 22, 2024
196Gal MishneJan 21, 2024
195Shlomo DubnovJan 21, 2024
194Ivan K. SchullerJan 21, 2024
193Oren FriedmanJan 21, 2024
192Norma FranklinJan 21, 2024
191Caleb HarrisJan 21, 2024
190Alejandro BottaJan 21, 2024
189Kathy Ehrensperger Jan 21, 2024
188Hilary BowersJan 20, 2024
187David KleinfeldJan 20, 2024
186Daniel ArovasJan 20, 2024
185Cathy HorwitzJan 20, 2024
184Avi YagilJan 20, 2024
183Alex GroismanJan 20, 2024
182Benjamin GrinsteinJan 20, 2024
181Elena OcherJan 20, 2024
180Rikki LaneJan 20, 2024
179Bob ZeidmanJan 19, 2024
178Martin ZandJan 19, 2024
177Dora AmdurJan 19, 2024
176Carol FaimanJan 19, 2024
175Charles FaimanJan 19, 2024
174Robert BlochJan 19, 2024
173Arthur Weglein Jan 19, 2024
172Peter TuckelJan 19, 2024
171Rosette LibermanJan 19, 2024
170Shari MarchbeinJan 19, 2024
169mitka golubJan 19, 2024
168Ayelet GilboaJan 19, 2024
167Haim PerlmutterJan 19, 2024
166Vivian ShulmanJan 18, 2024
165Gilbert MayorJan 18, 2024
164Bernard Green M.D.Jan 18, 2024
163Mark SafferJan 18, 2024
162Raanan EichlerJan 18, 2024
161Menachem BrennerJan 18, 2024
160Daniel CassutoJan 18, 2024
159Concepción Reverte BernalJan 18, 2024
158Eric MillerJan 18, 2024
157Sheldon RothblattJan 18, 2024
156Ronald GehrJan 18, 2024
155Randy WayneJan 18, 2024
154Zimra PanitzJan 18, 2024
153Michele GreenJan 18, 2024
152Alan SchwartzJan 18, 2024
151Stephen ShalinskyJan 18, 2024
150Ehud GreenspanJan 18, 2024
149Dana Robbins Jan 18, 2024
148Paul FerbankJan 18, 2024
147Richard WilkinsJan 18, 2024
146Michael SilverbergJan 18, 2024
145david varadyJan 18, 2024
144Adi AltshulerJan 18, 2024
143ann shapiroJan 18, 2024
142emily glogowerJan 18, 2024
141Julia KleinJan 18, 2024
140Jennifer RosenJan 18, 2024
139Martin Lockshin Jan 18, 2024
138Suzanne RozenbergJan 18, 2024
137Lew WedeenJan 18, 2024
136Yael ShemeshJan 18, 2024
135Frederick S NoverJan 18, 2024
134Eric Lawee Jan 18, 2024
133Cary SchwartzbachJan 18, 2024
132Zvi Shimon Jan 18, 2024
131Richard England Jan 18, 2024
130Jack KushnerJan 18, 2024
129bernard sepinwallJan 18, 2024
128Micha LazarusJan 18, 2024
127Edward BeckJan 18, 2024
125Nehama BersohnJan 18, 2024
124J. AbbinkJan 18, 2024
123Isaac BenabuJan 18, 2024
122George FleshJan 18, 2024
121Randi WiseJan 18, 2024
120moshe pollakJan 18, 2024
119Cheryl RosenJan 18, 2024
118Moshe Deutsch (Prof.)Jan 18, 2024
117MARILYN SAFIRJan 18, 2024
116Jose Carlos Carnevale Jan 18, 2024
115Jonathan EpsteinJan 18, 2024
114Naftali GreenwoodJan 18, 2024
113Moshe LevisonJan 18, 2024
112Manuel BudaJan 18, 2024
111Fred NaiderJan 18, 2024
110Marsha SteinJan 18, 2024
109Susan HandelmanJan 18, 2024
108Seymour MayneJan 18, 2024
107Cristina BettinJan 18, 2024
106Kevin Jon WilliamsJan 18, 2024
105Adam BuchJan 18, 2024