Amos N. Guiora*) and David Luban**): An Exchange on Law and Israel’s Gaza Campaign

  • 0

*) University of Utah – S.J. Quinney College of Law

**) Georgetown University – Law Center

ABA National Security Law Report, Vol. 31, pp. 1-6, February 2009
Churchill: ‘Plagiarism Occurred’ (But He Didn’t Do It)


Abstract:
This exchange on “Operation Cast Lead” – Israel’s December 2008-January 2009 campaign in the Gaza Strip-includes essays by Guiora and Luban, followed by Guiora’s response to Luban’s essay and Luban’s response to Guiora’s. Luban argues that the Gaza campaign violated both the jus ad bellum and jus in bello proportionality principles. He also argues that the Hamas civil administration were not lawful targets under Israel’s own interpretation of the law of armed conflict. Guiora argues that terrorism changes the landscape of armed conflict and requires a reconfiguration of international law. Under this reconfiguration, an entire terrorist organization may properly be targeted.

Keywords: Israel, self-defense, international law, Hamas, Operation Cast Lead, proportionality, counterterrorism, nation state, terrorism, suicide bombing infrastructure, non-state actor

To download the article clickhere and then SSRN


Contact Information

Amos N. Guiora (Contact Author)
University of Utah – S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801-581-4295 (Phone)
801-581-6897 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=6581&name=Guiora,Amos..

David Luban
Georgetown University – Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Amos N. Guiora*) and David Luban**): An Exchange on Law and Israel’s Gaza Campaign

  • 0