Prof. Gerald M. Steinberg is Member of the Board of Directors of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East
HRW Agenda Clouds Response by Gerald M. Steinberg
Letters The Wall Street Journal Europe February 9 2005
Sarah Leah Whitson’s letter (“The Middle East Through the Looking Glass,” Jan. 181) attempts to discredit my detailed analysis of Human Rights Watch’s destructive role (“The Unhelpful Hand,” editorial page, Jan. 10) with the ultimate trump card–the claim that I am a “security consultant for the Israeli government.” If all academics invited occasionally to express their views in government settings were disqualified from writing editorials, newspapers would be much thinner.
And Ms. Whitson’s boss, Ken Roth, who served as a prosecutor in New York before heading HRW, would lose a major platform to promote his ideology. Or perhaps her problem is with the legitimacy of this activity only with respect to the Israeli government –a position reflected in HRW’s agenda.
Beyond this awkward attempt to stifle debate, Ms. Whitson’s substantive points are thin reeds indeed. As Anne Bayefsky, Shimon Samuels and other delegates to the 2001 Durban conference have testified, HRW’s representatives were parties to shifting the conference’s focus from battling racism to attacking Israel. While Ms. Whitson highlights HRW’s single “definitive” study of suicide bombing, she does not explain why they buried all the evidence of Arafat’s role, in the spirit of Durban. And her claim that the defense of Israeli lives against terror constitutes the source of radical Islam (abetted by HRW’s accusations of “Israeli war crimes”) is both foolish and outside the human rights framework for which HRW solicits contributions.
In summary, Ms. Whitson’s letter is another example of the NGO political agenda that inflames incitement and hatred. It also highlights the importance of watching the watchers.
Gerald M. Steinberg Editor, NGO Monitor
1 See below
Letters to the Editor
The Middle East Through the Looking Glass
18 January 2005 The Wall Street Journal Europe
There’s a certain Alice in Wonderland quality to Gerald Steinberg’s diatribe against humanrights groups as supposed obstacles to peace (“The Unhelpful Hand,” editorial page, Jan. 10). For example, Human Rights Watch’s repeated condemnations of terrorism, including authorship of the definitive critical study of suicide bombing in Israel, somehow “contributed to incitement to terrorism.” Our strong and widely publicized rejection of unjustified criticisms of Israel at the 2001 nongovernmental conference on racism in Durban, South Africa become a “contribution of NGOs to incitement in the Palestinian territories.”
Mr. Steinberg dismisses human-rights criticisms of Israeli war crimes and other violations simply because Palestinians have also condemned them. For him, there is no difference between “Israeli defensive actions” and blatant violations of the Geneva Conventions, which seek to spare civilians from government excesses even in time of war or serious security threat. Israeli abuses are fueling radicals in Muslim countries and eroding Western sympathy for the embattled country, but criticizing those abuses somehow “boosts the most radical Palestinians and undermines moderate voices.”
Mr. Steinberg, a man who describes himself as a professor and NGO leader while omitting from his author’s biography that he is a security consultant for the Israeli government, should leave such twisted reasoning for fairytales.
Sarah Leah Whitson Middle East Director Human Rights Watch New York