The three-part course of action, decided following approval by UCL’s governing council last week, aims to raise awareness of various forms of racism targeted towards minority and ethnic groups.
The statement comes as a particular victory for members of the Jewish Society, who last year campaigned for the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Association’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which has now been implemented in full.
The IHRA definition of antisemitism directly codifies what it means to be antisemitic, thereby marking vital progress in furthering the protection of Jewish students from acts of intolerance and hatred. The definition has previously been adopted by over 130 UK councils, and is recognised by an additional 31 member of states of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, as of 2016.
Proponents of the IHRA definition maintain that a classified description of antisemitism is necessary in asserting practical changes to the way in which the Union deals with invitations extended to external speakers. Boundaries set by coherence to the IHRA definition will limit the welcoming of speakers with publicly unapologetic, attacking views that can leave Jewish students feeling unsafe.
According to the 2019 Antisemitic Incident Report issued by the Community Security Trust, a charity established to ensure the security of the British Jewish community, a recorded high of 892 antisemitic incidents within a six-month time span occurred earlier this year. Similar statistics were reported in a recent article published by The Guardian, which stated that antisemitism in the UK has reached worrying highs for a third successive year.
Speaking to The Tab London, Jewish Society President, Alex Halperin, expressed his “delight” at the academic community’s recently established policy, stating that the announcement comes at a time of utmost significance for UCL’s Jewish students in light of a recent spike in reported hate-crimes.
Early last year, UCL’s adoption of the IHRA definition was widely denounced in a vote, with 212 voting against the change and only 78 in favour. The university’s Academic Board initially brought to attention the proposal to adopt the IHRA definition at a meeting in February of 2019, at which “there was a lengthy discussion on the adoption of the definition and a diverse range of views [that] were expressed.”
Samuel Goldstone, reading History at UCL, argues in favour of the implemented definition, insisting that “This decision transcends social and political divides and should be welcomed by the entire student community.”
UCL have stated their continued commitment to champion race equality and tackle discrimination on campus.