BDS protests to ‘defend Al Aqsa’ and ‘globalize the intifada’ erupt. Student media censor pro-Israel and anti-BDS viewpoints.

  • 0


The spring semester approaches its end with a variety of BDS activities on campus. In the US several student governments have passed BDS resolutions and protested pro-Israel and pro-IHRA speakers. In the UK, the National Union of Students has elected a BDS supporting Islamist antisemite as its president, embroiling both universities and the government. The incitement provided by the increasingly Islamified ‘globalize the intifada’ movement has been critical to radicalizing students around the mendacious narratives of a ‘Palestinian genocide’ and violent ‘resistance.’ While the stated goal of the BDS movement is to isolate Israel, the actual result has been to polarize campuses and national politics over Israel and Jews. Another result has been sharp increases in violent antisemitic attacks.


BDS in April continued against the backdrop of Ramadan rioting over the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Palestinian and black students at the University of Illinois protested the Israeli response to Palestinian rioting by marching on campus including to the Hillel. A Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) representative stated that “Israeli occupation forces raided our beloved (Al-Aqsa Mosque) during the holiest month of the year for Muslims,” but a ‘Black Students for Revolution’ representative added “Black liberation movement and the Palestinian liberation movement are interconnected within the global struggle against capitalism, imperialism and colonization.”

The manner in which the religious and secular theologies of the two causes have been ‘intersectionally’ linked is obvious. Underscoring the fundamental antisemitism behind BDS, during Passover SJP members also protested outside a Jewish fraternity at Rutgers University, waving flags and calling Jewish students ‘baby killers’ and ‘terrorists.’ In a less overtly hostile event, at American University the Muslim Student Association pulled out of participation in an interfaith Seder with the American University Hillel after Palestinian rioting in Jerusalem, blaming “Hillel’s continued support for the state of Israel.”

A number of ‘Globalize the intifada’ demonstrations stated frankly that the goal of the BDS movement and its allied theologies is to end Israel. Protestors explicitly defended Palestinian terrorism and threatened attacks on Jews and Israelis. One example in New York organized by ‘Al Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition’ featured chants of “Smash the settler Zionist state,” “We don’t want two states. We want ’48,” and “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

One of the protest leaders, attorney Lamis Deek, also announced that “But we say unapologetically and boldly: Hamas are freedom fighters! PFLP are freedom Fighters! Islamic Jihad are freedom fighters! Fatah armed forces are freedom fighters! All of our people in Palestine are freedom fighters.” She added that “We also know that in these neighborhoods, on our streets, and on our campuses are the agents of genocide, are the agents of apartheid… And we come to say today and moving forward, we will go to them at every corner, in every university, in every place they exist. We will terminate the corridor of war crimes from New York to Palestine.”

American Muslims for Palestine and SJP chapters organized anti-Israel protests in Chicago, Los Angeles, which was billed as a “defend Al Aqsa” rally and which featured chants of “we don’t want two states, we want all of 48,” and New York, which featured chants of “we don’t want no two states, we want all of it!” as well as an assault of an individual holding an Israeli flag. A Toronto BDS protest cheered attacks on Israel with one organizer stating “Israel has witnessed the deadliest attacks that it has seen in the last 15 years, all because the Palestinian freedom fighters have been putting their lives to fight for freedom,” to which protestors responded “allahu akhbar.”

The speaker added “Where are the settlers going to go when Palestine is liberated? To quote Muhammed el-Kurd, Palestinian poet and activist from Sheikh Jarrah: ‘I actually don’t give a fuck.’… All Israelis are complicit in the crimes that are happening on Palestinian soil I have one thing to say to them: Settlers, go back home… Zionists are from America, and Canada, and Europe… They don’t even have genetic blood.”

Protests were also held in April in London and Berlin and featured traditional cries of ‘death to Israel.’ Violent protests have long been a feature of pro-Palestinian politics in Europe and recent trends in the US points to the growing Islamization of the BDS cause, melding traditional Islamic and post-colonial rhetoric.

Campus BDS campaigns also reflects Palestinian ‘anti-normalization’ demands, where any contact with ‘Zionists’ is deemed unacceptable, post-colonial ‘settler-colonial’ accusations that deny Jews have any indigenous connections to Israel and which glorify violent ‘resistance,’ and heinous claims of ‘Palestinian genocide.’

The controversial appearances of BDS activist and The Nation’s ‘Palestine correspondent’ Mohammad El-Kurd, who among other things has accused Israel of ‘harvesting the organs’ of Palestinians, highlighted the manner in which antisemitism and calls for violence are being normalized on campus. In a controversial appearance at Duke University El-Kurd stated that he did not “give a fuck” what happens to Jews if the Palestinian take all the land “from the River to the Sea.” At Arizona State University he also stated “if you heckle me, you will get shot.” Concerns over student activity fees being used to pay El-Kurd’s $5,000-$10,000 honorarium were voiced at Duke and Arizona State but with no results. His appearance at Georgetown Law School attracted outside attention thanks to his overt racism, but was defended by the administration.

Al-Kurd’s rhetoric was echoed in a seminar at CUNY Law School organized by the local SJP chapter, which accused Israel of ‘genocide,’ and which called for “the right of Palestinians as colonized people to resist the zionist (sic) occupation by any means necessary” in order to “liberate all of Palestine and for Palestinians to unite and overthrowing the settler colonial structure.”

Similarly, a public seminar by Rutgers University professor Noura Erekat made repeated charges that “Jewish superiority” is “fundamentally rooted in the belief that Jews are God’s chosen people,” and “Whereas Zionism seeks segregation and does not want to assimilate Jews with non-Jews, it’s Nazism that doesn’t want to integrate and assimilate Jews with non-Jews.” Her equation of Zionism with Nazism, racism and ‘white supremacy’ was sponsored by the University of Illinois’s Center for South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies (CASMES). Other ‘Israel Apartheid Week’ speakers, such as at Harvard University, expressed similar approval of antisemitic violence.

Conspiracy theories are now also a feature of BDS. At New York University Law School the SJP chapter drafted a statement claiming the “Zionist grip on the media is omnipresent,” and that “Palestinians are not obligated to engage in racialized ‘nonviolence’ theory and wait around for a United Nations action that will never come as their homes are taken from them.”

The episode came after a pro-Israel group at the law school circulated a statement noting “The Middle East is big enough for all its indigenous peoples to enjoy self-determination, security, and prosperity.” The SJP response, which was endorsed by 11 ‘progressive groups,’ decried the creation of Israel and claimed “it is imperative to emphasize that the loss of any lives is a direct result of the Israeli occupation, not the resistance of those who are occupied. To call it anything else is, in fact, a technique of dehumanizing Palestinians.”

In response, the NYU Law administration claimed that it was investigating the antisemitic statements and harassment while the SJP chapter complained it was being “smeared in the right wing press.” More broadly, the fact that future lawyers refused to acknowledge the possibility of two sides to a complex historical debate suggests a growing crisis in the legal profession.

Overall, the onslaught of claims that ‘Zionists control the media,’ repeated pairing of invented ‘Palestinian genocide’ and ‘Israeli Nazism,’ charges of ‘white supremacy,’ ‘settler colonialism,’ and racism, and demands to ‘free Palestine by whatever means necessary,’ create an ironic call for genocide. These calls also provide context for the tremendous increase in antisemitic threats and violence in 2021.

Standard BDS protests against Israeli and pro-peace speakers also continued in April. At the Kennedy School of Government, a talk by Israeli Ambassador Michael Herzog was disrupted by BDS supporters and culminated in a student walkout. One student complained “I’m disappointed that I go to a school where we can’t speak plainly about justice for Palestinians and the conditions that they’re living under, and that we are willing to platform war criminals who have directly contributed to those injustices.” BDS supporters had previously protested a talk by retired Israeli general Amos Yadlin, who is a fellow of the school.

BDS related manipulations of student media also expanded in April. In a form of retroactive cancelation, at the University of Chicago editors of The Maroon newspaper removed an op-ed that criticized the local SJP chapter’s call to “stop taking shitty Zionist classes,” alleging that it “flattened dialogue and perpetuated hate toward UChicago’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP UChicago), Palestinian students, and those on campus who support the Palestinian liberation struggle.” The editors reposted the op-ed after a long apology and series of ‘corrections’ regarding “factual inaccuracies in the op-ed were used to support Zionist and racist sentiments.”

In their fulsome apology, the editors went on to state “we recognize that The Maroon as an institution has a history of publishing and contributing to anti-Palestinian sentiments on campus and beyond, and SJP UChicago has compiled and protested articles they see as fitting this pattern.”

Similarly, an article in the University of British Colombia student newspaper on that schools BDS vote was “unpublished” after the editors were “made aware of an article written by the original writer of this piece when he was in high school on the topic of Zionism and antisemitism. The writer does not hold the views expressed in that piece anymore.” The original version of the piece noted that the student government did not consult Hillel or other Jewish organizations before pushing through resolution condemning “the Israeli state’s system of apartheid and its occupation of Palestine.” The student had previously written a piece in a high school newspaper stating that anti-zionism was antisemitic.

Meanwhile, at the University of Michigan, BDS supporters assailed the student government for archiving Instagram posts from 2021 that had expressed “solidarity” with Palestinians, deeming it a ‘betrayal’ and ‘silencing.’ The aim of permanently dominating student government social media through emotional blackmail appears to have been successful and student government representatives “responded with apologies and said they have every intention of either republishing the original statement or writing a new statement that aligns with the current wishes of the Palestinian students on campus.”

After a contentious lead up, a BDS referendum calling on the university to boycott Caterpillar and other firms, was held at Princeton University. The results, however, were not immediately obvious. Reports indicate that the student government representative responsible for the election had counseled pro-Israel students that abstentions would be counted in the total votes cast. Pro-Israel student then created their campaign around this principle, leaving students the option of simply abstaining from a contentious issue. The result was that 16% of students abstained, while 44% voted yes and 40% voted no. But after the referendum the student reversed his position and indicated that abstentions would simply not count and that only yes or no votes would indicate the result. By this metric the vote passed.

The result was a predictable series of claims and accusations from both sides, with the student election representative claiming a “miscommunication” had occurred and BDS supporters decrying both the premise of ‘abstention’ and the ‘antidemocratic’ manner in which the vote was appealed. The student government then held a special session to discuss the issue. It was conceded that the process was “unfair and incorrect” but the result was upheld since doing otherwise would “eliminate trust among the student body.” Puzzlingly, pro-BDS and anti-BDS supporters then applauded the result, which now includes developing a “paper” in support of the referendum to “demonstrate the will of the student body.”

In response, the university president stated, “At Princeton, any disassociation decisions are ultimately within the jurisdiction of the Board of Trustees, not the Undergraduate Student, Government or, for that matter, the University administration.” He added, “There is quite obviously no consensus on campus or in the broader University community about issues of Middle Eastern politics or what to do about them,” but “Arguments about who is in the majority, or which side ‘won’ a contested student election, are not material to Princeton’s decision-making.”

The student government at the University of Houston and Loyola University in Chicago passed divestment bills in the guise of ‘anti-war’ statements, while BDS bills were approved at Simon Fraser University and the University of British Columbia.

Elsewhere, however, BDS resolutions were thwarted. At Ohio State the student government president refused to sign an “emergency resolution” targeting investments in Caterpillar and other companies approved by the student government. An unconfirmed report indicated the student government president received legal counsel not to sign the bill because of his immigration status. A university representative expressed approval of the outcome, implying that it removed the necessity for the university itself to explicitly reject the student demand, which contravened Ohio’s anti-BDS law.

At the University of British Columbia (UBC), the administration condemned the student BDS bill, saying “constructive and respectful debate cannot occur when members of one group are made to feel personally attacked for their identity or where tolerance and inclusiveness are not fostered in productive discourse,” and that “We work to avoid polarization on the basis of student identity, religion, or political beliefs so that students are safe and free from harassment.” The UBC statement came after administrators at the University of Toronto cut funding to the student government after passage of a similar BDS bill targeting Israeli firms and Jewish students.

Meanwhile, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a bill calling for a student referendum on BDS was approved by the student government but was overruled by the student judiciary on a variety of procedural grounds. A university representative had already notified the student government that students would not be permitted to vote on the issue. In response the local SJP chapter cut its ties with the student government and accused “Zionist senators” of manipulating “the flaws of student government in order to advance their insidious anti-Palestinian, settler-colonial ideologies.”

The impact of BDS on national level student politics and on national policy continues to be felt in Britain. The National Union of Students (NUS), a steppingstone into national politics, is embroiled in an antisemitism crisis. The incoming president of the organization, Shaima Dallali, is on the defensive after discovery of her social media history. Old postings including “Khaybar Khaybar O Jews … Muhammad’s army will return Gaza” in addition to more recent organizing appearances by Islamist preachers and participating in anti-Israel demonstrations have brought a long series of antisemitic abuses by the organization to the surface. These most recently include inviting an antisemitic rapper to perform at a national conference.

Reports indicate hundreds of Jewish students signed a letter stating they were “scared, distressed and upset and feeling that NUS is not a safe place for them.” In response, more than 20 former NUS presidents sent a message to the organization’s trustees urging them to address Jewish students concerns with an investigation and apology or risk local student groups disaffiliation and government de-recognition. Individuals signing the letter include several current and former cabinet ministers, journalists, and other leading figures. The NUS responded by announcing an investigation.

For her part, Dallai has predictably accused her opponents of “gendered Islamophobia” and harassment. But the crisis reached new proportions when the British Education Secretary, Nadhim Zahawi, expressed concern over “systemic antisemitism” within the NUS and warned that its charitable status and links to the government were in jeopardy.

The unfolding NUS situation partially replicates the antisemitism scandal that began several years ago with BDS student clubs affiliated with the BDS in Labour Party. This reverberated into the party itself and exposed a pervasive culture of antisemitism and abuse from a hard core of activists that eventually lead to the ouster of Jeremy Corbyn and his Momentum faction from Labour.

A hard core of anti-Israel activists subverting an organization is a standard scenario. This was on display in March when the Middle East Studies Association (MESA) membership voted to support BDS. As with student organizations where anti-Israel culture takes grip of the campus environment, the MESA vote has cemented its role, and that of Middle East studies faculty, as prime movers of campus BDS and antisemitism.

One indication that leaders of academia more generally are increasingly supportive of anti-Israel politics pushed by a minority of members was that the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) declined to condemn the MESA move, as it had with earlier boycott calls. The AAUP has also issued a report opposing the adoption of the IHRA antisemitism definition.

The support of MESA for local BDS campaigns such as at McGill University – far afield from any professional academic concerns – underscores the political nature of the organization. In response, nearly 100 Jewish and pro-Israel organizations signed a letter calling on the Department of Education not to fund university programs with members who are boycotting Israel. The letter pointed specifically at Federally funded National Resource Centers that among other things train K-12 teachers on the Middle East.

Finally, reports indicated that a Vice Presidential Seder overseen by the husband of Vice President Kamala Harris included wine from the Psagot winery, located in the ‘territories.’ When Jewish media pointed this out, a Harris spokesman issued a ‘clarification’ stating, “The wine served at the Seder was in no way intended to be an expression of policy.” BDS activists were infuriated over the incident.  

BDS protests to ‘defend Al Aqsa’ and ‘globalize the intifada’ erupt. Student media censor pro-Israel and anti-BDS viewpoints.

  • 0

Alex Joffe

Editor SPME / BDS Monitor

Alexander H. Joffe is an archaeologist and historian specializing in the Middle East and contemporary international affairs. He received a B.A. in History from Cornell University in 1981 and Ph.D. in Near Eastern Studies from the University of Arizona in 1991. From 1980 to 2003 he participated in and directed archaeological research in Israel, Jordan, Greece and the United States. Joffe taught at the Pennsylvania State University and Purchase College, and has been Director of Research for Global Policy Exchange, Ltd., and The David Project, Center for Jewish Leadership.

Joffe's work is uniquely broad. Since 1991 he has published dozens of studies on the archaeology of the Eastern Mediterranean and is a leading figure in contentious debates over the relationship between archaeology and politics in the Middle East. He has also authored numerous works on contemporary issues, including Middle Eastern environmental security threats from pollution and weapons of mass destruction. His work on the problem of dismantling intelligence agencies is widely cited by experts and democratic reformers alike.

In the past decade Joffe has written and spoken on topics as varied as the future of American Jews, the Palestinian refugee problem, and nationalism. During that time as well he has been deeply involved with combating the problems of campus antisemitism, the ‘boycott, divestment and sanctions' movement against Israel, and in educating Jews and others about threats to Israel and the West. His current projects include a biography of a British World War II general and several novels. He and his family reside near New York City.

Read all stories by Alex Joffe