The Mother of All Sins

  • 0

Committing an act of terror against Israel at this particular juncture, or even condoning it, is the worst mistake Hamas can make. It is a mistake that will severely undermine its authority and shatter the ardent hope of the Palestinian majority to live in peace. Hamas must quickly rein in other militant groups if it does not want to become a pariah government subjected to Israeli military wrath and unable to govern in any way.

If Hamas, as a government, is adhering to the one-year-old ceasefire, then by what logic does it allow, even encourage, other militant organizations to violently resist the occupation? The most recent suicide bombing that killed four Israelis, for which the Aqsa Brigade took responsibility, has presented a dilemma for Hamas. Although Hamas, in its role as governmental authority, would rather prevent such an attack, Hamas, as an organization, seems to have preserved an “instinct” for continued violent resistance against the occupation, and this almost involuntary response is depriving it from following a decidedly more rational strategy, one that will likely sustain its ability to govern. Hamas’ leadership surely realizes that while Israel will punish the perpetrators, the Israeli government will also hold the Hamas-led Palestinian government responsible, as it previously did the Palestinian Authority led by the PLO. Hamas cannot simply put on a moderate face for the Western powers and seek their economic assistance and political support while publicly and explicitly endorsing acts of terror. In short, continuing violent resistance is the mother of all sins, especially now as the new Israeli and Palestinian governments assume, or prepare to assume, responsibility, offering a real opportunity to start a new page.

I am entirely against any act of violence from any side and will always support a negotiated agreement over a unilateral action, in which one party attains greater benefits than the other. Sadly, however, its propensity for continuing violent resistance is also already negatively affecting Hamas’ dealings with Kadima’s leader Ehud Olmert, most likely Israel’s next Prime Minister, a man committed to establishing Israel’s future borders through unilateral withdrawal if necessary. Given that Israeli withdrawal offers the Palestinians at least a part of what they want, how then can unilateral withdrawal be, “a recipe for conflict,” as Prime Minister Haniyeh argues in a recent article in The Guardian on March 31. Unfortunately, in public, Hamas’ leadership would like to perpetuate the baseless perception that Israel withdraws from territories only under fire, even though the withdrawal, regardless of motive, is designed to reduce and eventually end the occupation. If Hamas’ leaders really want to accelerate the withdrawal process, they must maintain public calm and demonstrate to both Israel and the rest of the world that the evacuated territories will not become staging grounds for acts of terror. This is the only way Hamas can encourage the Israelis to speed up the process of ending the occupation, especially if Mr. Haniyeh wants future withdrawal, and final borders, to be negotiated rather than determined unilaterally. To this end, Mr. Haniyeh cannot claim in his article, “We in Hamas are for peace and want to put an end to bloodshed” and then allow other groups to commit acts of terror against Israel with impunity. By not demanding that all Palestinian factions refrain from violence and by permitting other groups to violently resist Israeli occupation, by proxy, Hamas will invite swift and crippling Israeli retaliations that will cause tremendous pain and hardship to thousands of innocent Palestinians. This is not what Hamas promised while campaigning for power.

The worst consequences of this reckless behavior will be Palestinian civil strife, if not civil war. Hamas will be pitting the majority of Palestinians who want to live in peace and dignity against militant groups that have long since lost direction and “make” their dismal failures into virtues. Scores of other Palestinian groups and families will be at each other’s throats, not to speak of the tens of thousands of disgruntled Fatah security forces currently roaming the streets without a central authority in place. If Hamas does not get its act together, the recent killing of three Palestinians by Palestinian security forces will not be an aberration but the day-to-day norm.

Hamas is obviously going through the pains of transforming itself from a declared terrorist organization to what it wishes to be perceived as: a responsible government. Whereas Hamas’ leaders can be forgiven for committing initial mistakes, condoning suicide bombing must not be one of them. Let’s be totally transparent: Hamas’ future will rest on its ability not simply to adhere itself to the ceasefire but to demand the same from every Palestinian, and then firmly enforce this policy throughout the territories. Otherwise, Hamas’ victory will end up being just another mirage in the desert of the Middle East that leaves no traces.

—

alon@alonben-meir.com

Web: www.alonben-meir.com

The Mother of All Sins

  • 0
AUTHOR

Alon Ben-Meir

A Mid-East expert of exceptional knowledge and insight gained through more than 35 years of direct involvement with foreign affairs, Dr. Alon Ben-Meir offers an important perspective on the nature of world terrorism, ethnic conflict and international relations. A noted journalist and author, Dr. Ben-Meir is Middle East Director of the World Policy Institute at the New School for Social Research, and a professor of International Relations and Middle Eastern studies at New York University and at the New School. Born in Baghdad and residing in New York City, he holds a masters degree in philosophy and a doctorate in international relations from Oxford University.

The true nature of international terrorism and strategies for defeating world terrorism are the subject of Dr. Ben-Meir's most recent book, A War We Must Win, published in spring 2004. This collection of Dr. Ben-Meir's writings about terrorism, US foreign policy and the political and social dynamics of the Mid-East contain essays written both prior to and following the attacks of 9/11. An essay from 1976, describing the then-peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, offers a historical perspective on a situation that has seen little change in nearly 40 years. More recent essays provide hands-on guidance for shifting US anti-terrorism policy towards a more effective strategy.

Fluent in Arabic and Hebrew, Dr. Ben-Meir began his career as a journalist. His frequent travels to the Mid-East and conversations with highly placed sources in Jordan, Syria, Egypt and Israel provide him with the highest level of awareness of the developments surrounding breaking news. Dr. Ben-Meir is the author of numerous books, including The Middle East: Imperative and Choices; Israel: The Challenge of the Fourth Decade; In Defiance of Time, Framework for Arab-Israeli Peace, and The Last Option.

His views are often sought by major television and radio networks, and as a public speaker he frequently appears before groups and organizations at venues as varied as world affairs councils and town hall meetings. He also lectures on international relations at a variety of universities in addition to his residency at New York University and the New School.

 

  • SUGGESTED TOPICS FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

 

 

  • Has the prospect of Israeli-Palestinian peace improved or further deteriorated in the wake of the invasion of Iraq and the ouster of Saddam Hussein.

 

 

  • What are the sources of the Arab and Muslim hatred toward America and what the United States must do to mitigate it in order to sustain its regional influence and protect its national interest.

 

 

  • What it would really take to promote democracy and human rights throughout the Middle East and what policies the United State must pursue to contribute to this process.

 

 

  • Root-causes of international terrorism and is America and its allies are safer or more vulnerable today than before September 11.

 

 

  • What is the prospect of containing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the danger of failure and the policies the next administration must follow to achieve this objective.

 

 

  • Why an Israeli-Syrian peace must be on top of the next administration priorities and how such peace could change the geopolitical dynamic of the region for the better.

 

 

  • Why must administration take a new initiative with the two remaining members of the axis of evil-Iran and North Korea-- to prevent them form becoming nuclear powers or peddler of nuclear material and technology.

 

 

  • Why has American energy independence become one of the main prerequisites for defeating international terrorism.

 

 

  • Why multilateral approach to international conflicts is a sin-qua-non to defeating terrorism and how such an approach can enhance rather than diminish U.S. moral authority to lead.

 


Read all stories by Alon Ben-Meir