UNIFIL Confirms Israel’s Version: IDF Troops Didn’t Enter Lebanon; By Amos Harel, Avi Issacharoff and Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and Agencies, February 09, 2007

  • 0

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) accepted on Thursday Israel’s version of the events that concluded in an exchange of fire between the Israel Defense Forces and the Lebanese Army at the border late Wednesday.

UNIFIL patrolled the area around Israel’s and Lebanon’s shared border, photographed the site, and concluded that IDF troops operated entirely within Israeli territory.

The Lebanese Army on Wednesday fired warning shots at IDF troops, claiming that the troops had entered Lebanese territory.

The incident occurred north of the border fence that Israel erected several dozen meters within Israeli territory, but south of the actual international border between the two countries.

UNIFIL has not yet completed the official report on the incident, however, a UNIFIL representative briefed the UN Security Council on Thursday, and confirmed Israel’s version of the events.

Following the discussion on the matter, the UN Security Council called for the renewal of coordination meetings between the IDF, the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL that had been customary immediately following the Israel-Hezbollah war this summer. Lebanon was not interested in the renewal of such meetings.

The Security Council convened at the behest of France. The French ambassdor to the United Nations said Thursday that Paris wants the Council to discuss and react to the Wednesday night border clash.

“We think that the council should have an exchange of views on this issue, which is an important one,” France’s UN Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere told reporters.

“I am just going to ask for a briefing from the secretariat.”

On Wednesday night, an IDF tank fired two rounds at Lebanese Army positions opposite Moshav Avivim, after Lebanese troops fired on IDF soldiers searching for Hezbollah mines beyond the border fence but inside Israeli territory.

The IDF suffered no casualties, while UNIFIL reported that five Lebanese soldiers were wounded in the incident. The Lebanese Army has denied it sustained any casualties.

Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora on Thursday denounced what he called Israel’s violation of the Lebanese border, saying IDF troops crossed the internationally-recognized border line prior to the exchange of fire between the two countries’ forces. The incident was the first of its kind since the aftermath of last summer’s war between Hezbollah and Israel.

Siniora discussed the border clash with UN envoy Geir Pedersen, telling him that his government condemned what he described as the new Israeli aggression on Lebanon’s sovereignty and what he called the violation of the Blue Line, the UN-recognized border between the two countries.

Liam McDowell, a spokesman for the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), said the exchange was initiated by the Lebanese army and that the IDF bulldozer had crossed the border fence, but not the Blue Line, to clear mines.

The border fence lies several dozen meters south of the Blue Line.

Speaking to Pedersen in front of reporters, Siniora said the incursion compounded the daily violations of Lebanese sovereignty by Israeli aircraft.

On Thursday morning, Israel Air Force planes flew twice over southern Lebanon.

The IDF confirmed the overflights, saying that, “The incident yesterday hasn’t led us to change our aerial activity.”

Defense Minister Amir Peretz stressed Thursday that Israel is not seeking an escalation along the border, but that the IDF would return fire when fired upon.

Peretz’s comments came after a special security consulatations on the situation in the north.

Meeting with IDF Chief of Staff Dan Halutz and senior military officials, Peretz said that the “Northern Command operated according to regulations and in the necessary and correct manner, in keeping with UN Security Council Resolution 1701.”

“We have no intentions of escalation, but wherever there is fire endangering IDF forces we will have to react,” he said. “UNIFIL forces and the Lebanese Army are fulfilling their roles, and we intend to continue to operate within the political and regulatory framework established in recent months.”

Peretz added that “there is no intention of returning to the policy of looking the other way on Lebanon.”

Earlier this week, four explosive devices were discovered in the area. IDF sappers detonated them from a distance.

The IDF carried out yesterday’s operation after informing UNIFIL and the Lebanese Army of its intentions.

In response, the Lebanese Army warned the IDF that if its forces violated Lebanese sovereignty, it would open fire.

The IDF said that it did not intend to cross into Lebanese territory, but if its forces were attacked, it would respond.

Israel rejected Lebanese claims that it had violated Lebanese sovereignty, saying that the force was south of the international border – inside Israel – as delineated by the United Nations following the IDF pullout from southern Lebanon in May 2000. In some places, the border and the fence are several dozen meters apart.

Lebanese officials said an IDF bulldozer crossed the international border and entered about 18 meters into Lebanon.

A spokesman for UNIFIL, however, confirmed the exchange was initiated by the Lebanese Army after an IDF bulldozer crossed the border fence “in an apparent attempt to clear mines between the Blue Line (international border) and the fence.”

“We characterise this as a serious incident between the Lebanese Army and the IDF,” the spokesman said.

The IDF operation in the area caused grave concern on the Lebanese side, and drew the attention of the Lebanese Army.

Israel imposed a local media blackout, which was lifted as soon as Hezbollah’s Al-Manar went on the air with information about the operation. Al-Manar gave the operation a great deal of coverage, reporting that an Israeli armored column tried to cross into Lebanon close to Maroun al-Ras, which is across from Avivim.

The report stated that UNIFIL and a Lebanese Army officer held discussions with Israel, after which Israel agreed to cancel the mission.

The Lebanese News Agency reported that the Lebanese Army placed forces deployed near Maroun al-Ras on alert, fearing that the IDF planned to broaden its operation. It was also reported that IDF helicopters flew over southern Lebanon villages.

The IDF Northern Command was unable to confirm whether the explosive devices had been placed recently. Hezbollah, for its part, denied Tuesday that these were new bombs, saying they had been placed before the war in July.

A GOC Northern Command officer said yesterday that Hezbollah is still operating in southern Lebanon, but is keeping a low profile – its operatives avoid public displays of weapons, and wear civilian clothes.

Northern Command sources report that Hezbollah is working hard to replenish its ranks, sending conscripts for training in the Beka’a, in order to make up for its losses during the war.

The officer said there has been a growing presence of Islamic Jihad militants in southern Lebanon, as well as extremists affiliated with Al-Qaida and Sunni groups. These groups are seeking to challenge Hezbollah’s hegemony in the area.

The IDF officer said the army intends to clear all salients between the border and the fence of explosives.

“Our way of thinking has changed,” the officer said. “Before the war, the approach was that confrontation was bad for us, and therefore we kept away from the fence. Now the approach is that we will operate up to the Blue Line [the international border] and if the other side seeks a confrontation, it will get it,” the officer said.

This is not the first time the IDF has operated north of the border fence.

Following the army’s withdrawal from south Lebanon in 2000, the fence was redrawn. At several points its path was routed south of the border, as far as 100 meters in, in what the army cited as strategic considerations.

In searches conducted in recent months along the fence, IDF troops have discovered Hezbollah positions and equipment which appear to have been used in the abduction of two IDF soldiers in July 2006.

About two weeks ago, IDF troops destroyed two Hezbollah bunkers uncovered during searches of the area around the border fence. One of the bunkers was found during the war, and the other was uncovered last month.

Both bunkers were within Israel’s territory, somewhere between the international border and the border fence. The bunkers housed supplies, food and tools that would enable a long stay underground.

‘Syria rearming Hezbollah’

Defense Minister Amir Peretz on Wednesday accused Syria of allowing the rearmament of Hezbollah guerrillas in Lebanon and said Israel has the right to act forcefully against the Shiite militia to counter the threat.

Speaking to visiting U.S. Jewish leaders, Peretz said Syria, Hezbollah’s main ally, is continuing to allow weapons shipments to the group to cross its border with Lebanon.

“We can’t under any circumstances ignore the transfer of weapons and ammunition to Hezbollah,” Peretz said. “While Israel remains committed to the cease-fire we reserve the right to protect the citizens of the State of Israel and we will do this forcefully without any compromises.”

In Beirut, a Hezbollah official declined comment.

About two weeks ago, IDF troops destroyed two Hezbollah bunkers uncovered during searches of the area around the border fence. One of the bunkers was found during the war, and the other was uncovered last month.

Both bunkers were within Israel’s territory, somewhere between the international border and the border fence. The bunkers housed supplies, food and tools that would enable a long stay underground.

UNIFIL Confirms Israel’s Version: IDF Troops Didn’t Enter Lebanon; By Amos Harel, Avi Issacharoff and Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondents, Haaretz Service and Agencies, February 09, 2007

  • 0
AUTHOR

SPME

Scholars for Peace in the Middle East (SPME) is not-for-profit [501 (C) (3)], grass-roots community of scholars who have united to promote honest, fact-based, and civil discourse, especially in regard to Middle East issues. We believe that ethnic, national, and religious hatreds, including anti-Semitism and anti-Israelism, have no place in our institutions, disciplines, and communities. We employ academic means to address these issues.

Read More About SPME


Read all stories by SPME